Journal Article Analysis
This paper will be analyzing the journal article entitled Sisters of sorts: Reading romantic fiction and the bonds among female reader. The focus in the paper will be to outline the theme of the article, useful information, who its intended audience is, and what the authors point is. The cultural themes learned in this class such as stereotypes, myths, and icons, as well as other forces will be used to discuss the author’s main points of the article. Finally the conclusion will summarize the importance of reading this article, if it is relevant or not.
Sisters of sorts: Reading romantic fiction and the bonds among female readers is a journal article written in 2011 by Laura Struve a professor of English associates at Wilmington College in Wilmington Ohio. The article sisters of sorts deals with the studies and research of female romance novel readers, how they are viewed by society, and the stereotypes that they encounter for reading these novels in public. The articles explains that women that read romantic fiction novels are negatively viewed by society, they are seen as deluded neurotics, passive and some are stated to use the romance novels to escape reality and real life problems. Struve does a wonderful job in explaining the way these women are viewed, in that it is definitely a form of stereotype that most in society have judged them because of their choice of literature. It goes to show that in most cases people will judge you by the clothes you wear and even the books you read, all which are irrelevant, (Struve, 2005).
Another point that the article notes is that the disadvantage of the stereotype labels of these readers stems from the content of the of the novels, the genre of romantic novels almost always paints unrealistic lifestyles and courtship that leads to marriages in most of them. There is truth to this point in that these novels may have been close to reality many centuries ago when women did not work, or have rights, but times have changed, and for today’s audience this creates a problem because some will have unrealistic expectations of men, and in turn may cause them issues with their dating lives, (R.B. Browne, 2005).
Struve’s article also has low points in that it has not documented any studies of the percentage of women’s lives that live in comparison to the romantic novels that they have read. The amount of women that have changed their lifestyles and behavior to match a novel because of the romantic novel tell supports the study; this is also one of the myths that surrounds the notion of romantic love. Some women may be reading to escape the luck of real love, and using the novels as a replacement for what they find to be a myth. The studies would have supported the important point that she makes about society’s stereotype of women with a passion for romantic fiction novels. However Struve continues to give more serving information by stating that “Critics of romance readers fail to recognize that a reader’s choice to read a certain book does not imply the unquestioning adoption of its ideology,” (Laura Struve, 2011), which is realistic in that most women that read these novels, do so to have an outlet in a society where the right of independence also comes with difficult responsibilities, (Struve, 2011).
This article also notes that the purpose of choosing to read this genre of literature for most women is so that they can relate to each other, and that it serves as a form of fellowship. It is also noted by Struve that most romance novels are not reviewed by major newspapers, and readers rely on word of mouth to acquire information on the book, this statement can be supported by the current frenzy that Fifty shades of grey has caused. Fifty shades of grey is an erotic fiction novel written in 2011 by British author E.L. James, it can attribute most of its success, 10 million copies worldwide, to viral marketing, word of mouth and other female erotica novels such as Twilight, it’s increasing interest by readers had caused it to be purchased by Vintage books, to be re-released in April 2012. Romantic novels are still sold despite the luck of major advertising because they appeal to the mass market, which are most female readers, regardless of their interest for the book, some might just be reading them to get in the circle with other friends as part of the fellowship, (R.B. Browne, 2005).
The Sisters of sorts article is intended to educate the audience on the stereotypes and criticism that female readers of romantic novels endure, it is also for those that choose to read the romantic novels with the notion that someone is standing up for their freedom of choices made for literature without being negatively scrutinized. Others scholars seeking information about how romantic novel readers are viewed in the society for their research may also find it a little useful. The points made in the article gives clear pro’s and cons that the readers face, making it a viable article for anyone interested in learning about the community of romance readers, the authors, or the history regarding the popular culture of romantic literature, (Struve, 2011).
In conclusion the sisters of sorts article doe not hold much importance other than the person seeking information on individual views of women reading romantic novels, even though the article does have strong points when it discusses the stereotypes that these readers face. However the article fails to deliver studied evidence that would support its opinions on the stereotypes towards readers of romantic novels, this is where it becomes irrelevant, and if this was a study merely based on stereotyping, there are plenty of subjects which the writer Laura Struve could have displayed both her intellects and writing skills. Even though the article falls short on research, that it not to say that her subject was not important enough to cover, it just lucks research and studies that would have strengthened this article for most popular culture studies.
Reference
Struve, L., (2011). Sisters of Sorts: Reading Romantic Fiction and the Bonds Among
Female Readers, 44 (6), 1289-1303.
Brown, R. B, (2005).
Profiles of popular culture
, Wisconsin: The University of Wisconsin Press